product placement
How fashion brands actually get into major films and television
The process requires months of advance planning and careful alignment between production teams and brand executives, with costume designers holding the power to approve which brands appear on screen.

When a luxury watch appears on an actor's wrist or a designer jacket anchors a character's look in a major film, it's rarely accidental. The placement represents months of negotiation, strategic positioning, and careful alignment between production teams and brand executives. Fashion brands secure these appearances through a structured process that has become increasingly formalized, with production designers, costume designers, and prop masters making the key decisions about which brands appear on screen.
Understanding how this works reveals the complex ecosystem where entertainment, business, and aspirational marketing intersect. The process is as much about understanding production timelines and budgets as it is about aesthetic fit and narrative logic.
The decision-makers who choose what brands appear
The costume designer holds particular power in determining which fashion brands appear in a production. When a production begins, costume designers work together with the prop master and production designer to brainstorm which brands to solicit.
The specific contact varies by project tier. On smaller productions, an email to the costume designer at the studio may suffice. Larger films involve conversations with the line producer, set decorator, and sometimes the director. The prop master often manages the logistics of receiving products, but the costume designer typically maintains authority over whether items fit the story's aesthetic and character development.
Brands can reach out directly by researching costume designer names on IMDb and sending information through traditional mail to the studio, or they can work through specialized intermediaries who maintain relationships with production departments. Some platforms now allow productions to post their specific product needs, and brands offering those products can send items to the set in response.
The six-month window when deals actually happen
The most critical rule in securing placement is timing. Sourcing a placement requires a minimum of six months from initial pitch to final deal, though this timeline compresses somewhat for streaming content and short-form projects. This extended timeline exists because productions need time to review, approve, and integrate products before cameras roll. Pre-production is the essential window: the moment when scripts can still be modified to accommodate a brand and when costume departments have room to pivot their sourcing strategy.
A production company typically begins by breaking down the script to identify scenes that might accommodate brand integration. This script analysis reveals which moments are open for a brand to appear naturally within the story. Brands then evaluate whether the fit makes sense—whether the character, the tone of the scene, and the overall narrative align with their brand identity and marketing goals. If a production's timeline is too tight or the brand-character fit feels forced, negotiations stall or never begin.
How brands pitch and what gets negotiated
Brands or their representatives prepare detailed pitch packages that include a logline, genre classification, target audience demographics, projected reach, production budget tier, and shoot and release dates. Most critically, they provide a scene-by-scene breakdown of moments open for placement. Productions assess each brand pitch on brand safety, tone alignment, and timeline fit before moving to negotiation.
Once both parties are interested, negotiations determine the specifics: which products appear, how many seconds they remain on screen, whether competing brands are restricted from appearing, payment or barter terms, credits, and contingencies if scenes containing the placement are cut during editing. These conversations require candor about budget. The financial commitment a brand is willing to make fundamentally shapes what placement opportunities are available.
“When an aspirational character wears an item, it's a very powerful statement—audiences will actively seek out the product on brand websites and social media, resulting in a purchase.”
The economics: what placement actually costs
Pricing varies dramatically across production tiers. Independent films typically involve zero payment and consist entirely of in-kind trades—a brand provides clothing or props in exchange for on-screen exposure. Web series and creator partnerships generally range from $100 to $500 per placement. Mid-tier streaming productions with visible props command around $50,000, while network television placements run $100,000 to $500,000. Blockbuster films with major stars and guaranteed wide release typically involve deals worth $1 million or more.
The cost reflects screen time, visibility, whether the product is essential to a plot point, and the size of the potential audience. For productions, the financial benefit is immediate: filmmakers reduce costume and prop budgets by securing complimentary usage of clothing, accessories, and luxury goods. In 2021 alone, the film industry generated $2.77 billion from product placement deals.
What gets on screen and why it works
Fashion brands pursue product placement because it works. When an aspirational character wears a designer item, it elevates brand prestige and influences purchase behavior. Viewers actively seek out featured products on brand websites and social media after watching films or shows.
Recent films demonstrate the range of how this works in practice. In *Emilia Pérez*, Saint Laurent dressed multiple characters with items from the brand's collections, and pieces worn by characters sold directly to consumers. In *Fly Me to the Moon*, the Omega watch served as a practical plot element tied to the film's space-race setting. In *It Ends with Us*, Carhartt appeared so frequently that the workwear brand functioned almost as a character itself, reinforcing a working-class aesthetic. Costume designer Jonathan Anderson used Loewe extensively in both *Challengers* and *Queer*, releasing exclusive merchandise tie-ins—including a t-shirt inspired by a JFK Jr. image that appeared in *Challengers*—that merged costume design with fashion retail.
Streaming services increasingly drive this trend. Netflix's commitment to increasing original content to 46.5 percent of programming has created more opportunities for fashion placements. As platforms compete for prestige and pursue diverse revenue streams, fashion will find more opportunities to appear in film and television in coming years, particularly when a brand's aesthetic naturally complements a character or story rather than interrupting it.
Related coverage: Why Fashion Houses Court Film So Aggressively; What a Costume Designer Actually Does.
More from Style
costume design
How costume designers source and authenticate fabrics for period films
Researchers consult museum collections, historical documents and textile experts to ensure that every garment reflects its era's materials and construction techniques.


